Playwright testsproven on your real page.
Say what to test and paste a URL. PlaywrightGen reads the page, writes the test, runs it in a real browser and fixes the failing step until it passes — or shows you the step it could not fix. Then your team reviews it, with the passing run as evidence, before it counts.
Quality evidence map
Illustrative project workflow
Requirement
Approved intent
Test Cases
Linked scenarios
Automation
Browser + API
Run Evidence
Immutable attempts
Highest-value action
Review the failed run and its evidence before approving the automation or making a release decision.
One product, two ways to start
Explore freely. Build trust in Workspace.
Free tools help you reach a useful first result quickly. Workspace turns that one-time result into versioned, reviewable project evidence.
Free tools
Fast, preliminary analysis
Use a focused tool when you want a disposable draft or a quick second opinion. These results do not claim durable project coverage.
Workspace
The system of record for quality
Use Workspace when evidence must survive beyond one prompt: assign ownership, preserve versions, review automation, record execution, and keep every decision inside the correct organization and project.
The quality evidence loop
From approved intent to an explainable release decision
Each stage produces a record the next stage can reference. Nothing important has to live only in a chat transcript or a copied code block.
Define approved intent
Keep acceptance criteria, ownership, review state, and every material revision inspectable.
Make coverage explicit
Link business intent to structured scenarios, expected outcomes, priority, and review history.
Generate reviewable code
Create separate Browser and API artifacts with deterministic validation and human approval.
Preserve what happened
Keep each result, step outcome, environment, failure detail, and evidence link immutable.
Act on the real gaps
See missing coverage, unresolved failures, stale evidence, and the next highest-value action.
Works where your team already works
Your editor writes the code. PlaywrightGen keeps the proof.
Every editor now has an assistant that writes Playwright. What it cannot know is which behaviour your team agreed on, and whether the last run proved it. That is what PlaywrightGen gives it.
Your editor
Approved tests, inside VS Code, Cursor and Claude Code
Over MCP, your editor's assistant writes a test from the real page, makes it pass, and proposes it with that run as evidence.
Proposes, never approves · personal token · revoked when access ends
Your CI
Your runners, your secrets, our evidence
Tests run on your own runners. Only a bounded summary comes back, attached to the exact approved version it exercised.
Signed reports · nothing of yours executes here
Everyone else
Proof for the people who ask whether it was tested
Send a manager, a customer or an auditor a read-only link to this project's evidence, or one file they can keep. No account, no test code, no way in.
Expires · stoppable the moment you change your mind · not indexed
Your team
A second pair of eyes on every approval
Members write, leads approve, and nobody approves their own work while somebody else can. Every step shows who and when.
Leads · Members · Viewers · review queue
# In VS Code, Cursor or Claude Code
you Using PlaywrightGen, write the test for our checkout test case.
assistant Read “Customer completes checkout” — approved, version 3, 4 steps. Writing tests/customer-completes-checkout.spec.ts with the title [pwg:7c1e…] so your CI results attach to version 3.
QA and SDET leads
One record for intent, automation, runs and failures.
Developers
The next test to write, and why the last one failed.
Engineering managers
What is verified and what is not, before you ship.
Trust model
AI assistance without invisible authority
Not maximum automation at any cost: faster quality work that stays reviewable, attributable and safe to challenge.
Evidence before confidence
Every claim links to the record behind it.
AI proposes. People approve.
It drafts, runs and diagnoses. It approves nothing.
History stays inspectable
A later edit never changes what was reviewed or run.
Start with the evidence you have
Turn the next quality question into a durable team decision.
Try a focused free review, or enter Workspace when the result needs ownership, history, approval, and project context.