Know what to test.Know whether to ship.
PlaywrightGen connects requirements, test intent, reviewable automation, execution evidence, and failure intelligence so your team can act on quality risk instead of guessing from disconnected AI output.
Quality evidence map
Illustrative project workflow
Requirement
Approved intent
Test Cases
Linked scenarios
Automation
Browser + API
Run Evidence
Immutable attempts
Highest-value action
Review the failed run and its evidence before approving the automation or making a release decision.
One product, two ways to start
Explore freely. Build trust in Workspace.
Free tools help you reach a useful first result quickly. Workspace turns that one-time result into versioned, reviewable project evidence.
Free tools
Fast, preliminary analysis
Use a focused tool when you want a disposable draft or a quick second opinion. These results do not claim durable project coverage.
Workspace
The system of record for quality
Use Workspace when evidence must survive beyond one prompt: assign ownership, preserve versions, review automation, record execution, and keep every decision inside the correct organization and project.
The quality evidence loop
From approved intent to an explainable release decision
Each stage produces a record the next stage can reference. Nothing important has to live only in a chat transcript or a copied code block.
Define approved intent
Keep acceptance criteria, ownership, review state, and every material revision inspectable.
Make coverage explicit
Link business intent to structured scenarios, expected outcomes, priority, and review history.
Generate reviewable code
Create separate Browser and API artifacts with deterministic validation and human approval.
Preserve what happened
Keep each result, step outcome, environment, failure detail, and evidence link immutable.
Act on the real gaps
See missing coverage, unresolved failures, stale evidence, and the next highest-value action.
Designed for the whole delivery conversation
One shared view of quality, different decisions for each role
QA and SDET leads
Connect planning, automation, execution, and failure review without maintaining separate evidence spreadsheets.
Developers
Get a clear next test, inspect generated Playwright code, and understand failures without losing engineering context.
Engineering managers
See what is covered, what is unresolved, and which evidence is still missing before a release decision.
Trust model
AI assistance without invisible authority
The goal is not maximum automation at any cost. The goal is faster quality work that remains reviewable, attributable, and safe to challenge.
Evidence before confidence
Every durable quality claim should link back to the Requirement, Test Case, artifact, run, or finding that supports it.
AI proposes. Teams approve.
AI can review, generate, and diagnose. It cannot silently change approved intent or turn generated output into trusted automation.
History stays inspectable
Versions and execution attempts are preserved so a later edit never changes what the team previously reviewed or ran.
Start with the evidence you have
Turn the next quality question into a durable team decision.
Try a focused free review, or enter Workspace when the result needs ownership, history, approval, and project context.